Broncos Extend Darian Stewart

Somebody clearly needed to get his mind off a crushing Michigan loss to Ohio State.

Confirmation, with an early estimate (always beware those) on total contract value and guarantees:

A $7 million average per year puts him on the second tier of safety pay in the NFL.  The most recent relevant contract would be what Tashaun Gipson agreed to with the Jaguars.

The 2016 Playoff Path For 31 NFL Teams

In the spirit of Thanksgiving tomorrow, I figured I would have fun with the ESPN Playoff Machine and concoct a way in which 31 of the 32 NFL teams (sorry Browns fans, the Factory of Sadness churns on) find a way to make the playoffs.  And to make this especially sunny for each team, each scenario linked will contain the highest seed possible for the team in question, as well as maximum misery for their division rivals. Continue reading The 2016 Playoff Path For 31 NFL Teams

Chiefs/Broncos On Week 12 Flexed To Sunday Night Football

On the one hand, it’s not surprising at all that Patriots/Jets is getting flexed out given the Jets’ mind-numbing 9-6 loss to the Rams that dropped them to 3-7.  And certainly Chiefs/Broncos has major division and playoff implications for both teams.

However, I’m surprised that CBS was unable to protect Chiefs/Broncos for themselves.  The network did not have many other great games that week (Bengals/Ravens, maybe?), and typically CBS and Fox get to protect their best game once per week.  I’m curious if some horse-trading between the networks occurred behind the scenes.

Nonetheless, this means that both 2016 games between the Broncos and Chiefs will be called not by Jim Nantz and Phil Simms, but instead by Al Michaels and Cris Collinsworth.

Open Thread: Election Day 2016

Just in case this ends up in conversation today, I figured it would be prudent to catch it early in the morning and give it its own place.  There should be no illusion that this is an inherently political thread, so if you’re uncomfortable with that, the best and easiest solution is to just not click on this thread.  But if you do have interest, this thread is for you.

There is, however, one important issue on the ballot that does affect the NFL, and that is Measure C in San Diego that seeks to raise the hotel tax to fund a new stadium for the Chargers.  So don’t say that this Election Day isn’t entirely unrelated to football–even if there are comically inept attempts to tie the two together.

Would Trading Really Help The Broncos’ Offensive Line?

The struggle of the offensive line is a burning topic for the Broncos again this season.  The latest to throw some significant fuel on it is Mike Kiszla, concluding with this usual shocker: “Unless the Broncos make a deal, I’m afraid the road to the Super Bowl is doomed to end in a brick wall.”

The easy counter to that sentence is that the Broncos had arguably worse problems on the offensive line last year.  But even if you have reasonable skepticism that the Broncos could repeat such a performance with weaknesses on the offensive line, caveat emptor should also be exercised before getting on board with the idea of improvement via a major trade before tomorrow’s deadline, such as for frequently mentioned names like Cleveland’s Joe Thomas or San Francisco’s Joe Staley.

The offensive line problems are different in 2016 than in 2015

Last season, the Broncos suffered some vicious bad luck at the tackle position.  Left tackle Ryan Clady was lost for the season early on, and his primary backup and right tackle candidate Ty Sambrailo followed Clady to IR early during the regular season.  This forced the Broncos to play Ryan Harris off the street at left tackle, and the extremely green Michael Schofield at right tackle.

With a situation like that, where it was certain that Clady and Sambrailo were lost for good, it would make sense to seek a direct replacement at the tackle position.  And indeed, the rumor mill implied that at this time last year, a trade for Thomas was considered to be very close.

But this year, the Broncos have not lost their projected starting tackles for the season.  Whatever you may think of them, Russell Okung and Donald Stephenson are still available to play.  The drop in talent is not nearly as steep as it was in 2015. Trading for Thomas or Staley would be a serious indictment of the decisions to acquire Okung and/or Stephenson in free agency.  I would hasten to add that in the long run, that is not disastrous, especially in the case of Okung and his effective one-year contract.  But it would be quite the disappointment for 2016.

This year, the team that mimics the 2015 Broncos the most in this department (and more!) are the Minnesota Vikings.  Both left tackle Matt Kalil and right tackle Andre Smith are lost for the year, and many have said that this weakness might be the only thing stopping the Vikings from a serious Super Bowl run.  I would expect the Vikings (along with the Seahawks, who have their own debilitating offensive line problems) to be more aggressive in a possible Thomas or Staley trade.

What do you do with Okung and/or Stephenson if you acquire Thomas or Staley?

This, to me, is the primary question that makes me averse of such a high-profile acquisition.  As far as I can tell, Thomas has exclusively played left tackle in his career, and Staley as well except for right tackle his rookie year, meaning both have played the same position for at least eight and a half seasons.  Okung, too, has only played left tackle as he’s in the middle of his seventh season.

If the Broncos acquire Thomas or Staley, then one of two things have to happen.  One would be to bench Okung.  In addition to that being a strong signal that they’d have given up on him, it only hypothetically improves the left tackle position.  The other is to move Okung to right tackle, again a position he hasn’t played in the pros, with the most common next move to be to send Stephenson to right guard and Schofield to the pine.  Some seem to think that all that shuffling would be a net positive, but I hold much skepticism, especially as I consider other points.

Midseason acquisitions don’t have a full complement of the Broncos’ playbook

I think it’s safe to say that most of us were excited when the Broncos acquired Vernon Davis from the 49ers last year in exchange for what will likely be demoting two 6th round picks to 7th round picks.  I think it’s also safe to say that, although we were certainly happy that the Broncos won the Super Bowl, they did so very much in spite of what turned out to be minimal contribution by Davis.

Thomas or Staley may be of a higher caliber than Davis, but there is also a risk that they may not turn out to be a fit for Gary Kubiak’s offense, or at least take more time than anticipated to adjust to it. (In fairness, Thomas did play for one season under Kyle Shanahan at offensive coordinatory, so he would at least have some direct knowledge.)  The compensation at stake will be much greater that it was for acquiring Davis, as well.

When will the tank run out for Thomas and Staley?

This is the next natural question to ask.  Staley is 32, and Thomas will turn that age on December 4th (a fine birthday, indeed!)  When a team uses a first or second round draft pick, it should be expected to get, respectively, five and four seasons of high play for the player they get.  It’s reasonable to guess that both players could have four or five more good years in them, but it’s also reasonable to guess that Father Time could catch up to them beforehand.  John Elway rolled the dice successfully with Peyton Manning and DeMarcus Ware, but at some point snake eyes could come up.

Time could be what heals the 2016 offensive line

Turn back the clock to the darkest time of 2015, when Schofield made Khalil Mack look like Lawrence Taylor.  Many of us, myself included, were ready to bail completely on Schofield, even if it meant using a running-on-fumes solution in Tyler Polumbus.  Many also worried if Schofield and company would be the reason for doom the 2015 Broncos.

But a funny thing happened, of course: that doom never came.  The offensive line as a unit steadily solidified, and put together a decent playoff run.  It didn’t play great, of course, but good enough to get the Broncos where they wanted to go.  Stability is a factor in strong offensive line play, and to achieve it, there’s often not a shortcut for patience.


I will hazard a guess that come this time tomorrow, neither Thomas or Staley will be traded to the Broncos, and perhaps not anywhere.  Cleveland, in particular, is looking more like they are not interested in completely gutting their little high-level veteran talent given their acquisition today of Jamie Collins from the Patriots. And it needs to also be mentioned that much of this talk is generated from what makes some modicum of sense to those that follow football, and such talk may not even qualify as proper rumors.

Barring the level of compensation, I will not be crestfallen if I am wrong, as contractually it is easy enough to say goodbye to Okung or Stephenson in 2017 if the Broncos are ready to make that commitment.  But unlike 2015, the 2016 offensive line deck is one that Elway himself dealt, and in my opinion a move now would be a hasty fold that leads into going all-in on the next deal.

What If The Regular Season Overtime Rule Was Never Added?

In honor of the kicking trainwreck that was Sunday night’s 6-6 tie between the Seahawks and Cardinals, I thought it might interesting to see what happened if the NFL never took the step of instituting regular season overtime in 1974.  As you may know, the first such game invoking the rule was when the Broncos hosted the Steelers that year–and it still ended in a tie.  The only other time the rule was invoked that year was a Big Apple showdown between the Giants and Jets.  And if you know anything about football in New York in 1970s, it was very pathetic, so the outcome of that game did not affect any playoff seedings.

But if ties at the end of regulation remained that way after 1974, there would indeed be changes in fortune for several teams.  The following is a list of how playoff teams and seedings would have changed–and yes, we’ll have to ignore a bunch of alternate history butterflies that would take place in making the difference between a team going deep in the playoffs, or firing the coach and front office after barely missing them.

And be forewarned: this universe is not kind to the Broncos, so we should all be grateful that regular season overtime exists. Continue reading What If The Regular Season Overtime Rule Was Never Added?